There are
cameras all around us. ATMs, lifts, shops, traffic lights, parking stations all
have cameras. Most of us even have a camera we regularly use on our phones.
Everywhere we go there is potential that our movements are being recorded and
monitored.
Most people
accept this as being part of living in today’s world. We surrender some of our
privacy in exchange for being able to conduct our lives without needing to go
to extraordinary lengths to avoid this level of surveillance. However, the
information being recorded is our personal information and for those public
authorities owning and operating CCTV there are legislation and guidelines
dictating how CCTV systems are to be used. In NSW this is found in the Privacy
and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (PPIPA), the Workplace
Surveillance Act 2005 and the NSW Government Policy Statement and Guidelines
for the Establishment and Implementation of Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) in
Public Places (2014). Other Australian states have similar legislation.
In 2013 the
NSW ADT (SF v Shoalhaven City Council) found that the Council had breached
section 10, 11(a), 12(c) of PPIPA and until the council could comply cameras
had to be turned off.
Section 10
of PPIPA relates to requirements when collecting personal information. In this
section reasonable steps must be taken to inform:
- information is being collected; purposes of collection;
- intended recipients of information;
- if supply is voluntary or not;
- right of access to information and correction;
- name and address of agency to hold the information.
The breach
of section 10 related to signage. The ADT found that the signage was not
sufficient to “ensure that individuals are made aware of all the information
addressed by section 10” To comply the Council had to change their signage.
Signs
went from:
The
original sign was no different from signs displayed by most Councils in
Australia. Additionally, the Council needed to install signs under or near each
camera.
The breach
to section 11 (a) of PPIA. This section concerns the collection of information
in that the information collected is relevant to the purpose of collection, not
excessive, is accurate, up to date and complete. The ADT considered the
majority of personal information collected by CCTV was “collateral” and not
relevant to “crime prevention”. This refers to the collection of images of all
people in a location even though they are not engaged in the act of committing
a crime.
Compliance
with this section required the NSW government to exempt local government from
section 11 of the Act with respect to the collection of personal information.
The breach
to section 12(c) related to procedural matters of how guidelines were being
followed by Council partners when accessing the live feed. This was addressed
by reinforcing with Police the access procedure.
The Council
CCTV system was turned off for four weeks with cameras being gradually restored
as signs were updated. Many other Councils would probably still have signage
that doesn’t comply.
Guest blog written by:
Community Development Co-Ordinator,
Shoalhaven City Council
No comments :
Post a Comment