As the population ages and Australia’s
baby-boomers reach retirement, the demand for affordable retirement living
options is higher than ever.
Retirement villages are
specifically designed to meet the accommodation, social and recreational needs
of over 55s – for many, they offer the perfect solution for a restful and
enjoyable senior lifestyle, boasting state-of-the-art facilities, inviting
communities and *seemingly* affordable pricing plans.
However,
as part of its four-point plan to improve
retirement village living, the NSW Government commissioned an inquiry into the
NSW retirement village sector in late 2017, in an effort to review the
protections offered to residents and monitor whether villages are operating in
compliance with the law.
Championing the list of compliance concerns is the lack of
transparency in village contracts and fee agreements.
One of the less understood considerations for prospective
residents when buying into a retirement village is the Deferred Management Fee,
or ‘DMF’.
Most retirees don’t realise just how much departure fees can
cost them, and get a nasty shock when they find out. Contracts are lengthy and
difficult to understand, and many residents suffer a great deal of stress when
they are ready to sell and find out that a large chunk of their profits are not
theirs after all. They are often unaware as to the implications of this
condition when signing contracts, and suffer a huge financial sting for
residents and their families in the long run.
However,
property giant Stockland is bringing change to the retirement village horizon.
Aspire
by Stockland defines itself as a “new kind of living for the over 55s”.
Rather
than typical retirement village contracts which see residents pay entry fees of
between 65-70 per cent of a typical property price in the area, followed by an
exit fee on departure after a lifetime lease, Aspire in Sydney’s Marsden Park
will see residents pay for and own 100% of their property.
It’s
a step in the right direction, however Stockland CEO Stephen Bull admits a
national rollout will incur legislative friction.
“Because this product doesn’t fall under the Retirement
Living Act, we need to get planning support,” he said.
Nevertheless, this hopefully signifies
positive change in the face of retirement living.
Written by: Beth Hampton
I came to Australia in late 2016, having spent some time travelling through Southeast Asia and briefly living in Singapore – I was ready to embrace the lifestyle of a working Sydneysider!
Love cooking, playing the piano, terrible British soap operas, an ice-cold G&T and exploring new places.
No comments :
Post a Comment