Digitisation means different things to
every organisation. I’ve just returned from an Inter-parliamentary Union (IPU)
mission to Tuvalu to undertake an ICT capability assessment for the Tuvalu
Parliament. Tuvalu is a small and isolated pacific nation, which is travel
brochure beautiful and full of wonderful people. Tuvalu has little in the way
of natural resources, and is heavily dependent on imports and international
aid. Getting a computer working after something goes wrong is challenging in
its own right. To the Tuvalu Parliament, just being able to store parliamentary
documents electronically, in a central repository, and then being able to share
these documents with the 15 members of parliament electronically, would seem like
digitisation.
When Gartner introduced the concept of the
Nexus of Forces back in 2014, it was hard for many of us to appreciate the
impact the Internet of Things was going to have on our personal and
professional lives. Why on earth would you want an internet connected fridge?!
The constant improvement in consumer technology, and the increasing ease at
which previously complex tasks can be completed by anyone with a powerful
enough smart phone, led to an expectation of the same ease and choice we have
in our personal lives to also be available in our professional lives.
New Zealand Parliaments journey of
digitisation started back in 2013. We started with the vision of “enabling a
mobile workforce to work securely anywhere, with fit for purpose tools”. Like
most organisations, we knew we would need multiple streams of activity.
We knew we needed to rebuild the
parliamentary network to support a mobile workforce. We also knew we would
probably want to move to the Cloud at some point, so the network design needed
to support this type of traffic. It was when we replaced our 30 year old PABX
with Skype for Business (SfB) we had our first reality check – don’t believe
anyone who says you don’t need to have some form of Quality of Service (QOS) in
place to make good quality phone calls using SfB! Four years later we have just
about completed the network refresh – it is hard to make substantive change
around the busy business of parliament.
Another major stream of activity was our
Line of Business applications. Many of the systems supporting the House were
built on old technologies that were either no longer supported or becoming end
of life. With an eye to one day moving to the Cloud, we defined a Technical
Reference Model (TRM) for parliament that ensured the same frameworks,
languages and technologies were used for all of parliament’s applications.
Rightly or wrongly we choose SharePoint as the common platform on which to
deploy our applications. We now have a stable and supportable stack of
applications that, with a little bit of work, can be redeployed to the Cloud
when we are ready to do so.
Security is a major concern in itself.
Parliament naturally becomes a target for cyber activity by the very nature of
what it represents. We are required to implement the highest level of security
our users will tolerate, without impeding members rights around parliamentary
privilege. Security is a constant tension against usability, and too often if
you leave it up to the security experts to determine what is needed, you end up
with something not very useful to your users. You can achieve a lot in the
security space just through implementing a good user education programme.
Which brings me to our last major stream of
activity – supporting our users. User expectations are constantly increasing
against a back drop of evolving technology in the consumer space. If you can’t
make it easy for them, they will work around you – implementing their own
solution is just a google search and credit card away. More than ever you need
to be talking to your users, understanding what they are trying to achieve and
help guide them towards a solution you will be able to support them on, will
also meeting your own standards and requirements.
I’m still not sure if my fridge will ever
be connected to the internet, but it is starting to looking more compelling
five years on from when I first heard it suggested, and, at some point, the
choice may not even be mine to make.
Still interested? Stay tuned for information on upcoming conferences and summits by following us on Facebook @ Akolade Aust
Written by: Michael Middlemiss, Chief Information Officer at Parliamentary Service
Michael has worked within the Information Technology industry for over twenty years and has acquired significant experience across a wide variety of roles, technologies, industries, and business processes.
Michael has been involved in all levels of Information Technology, from hands on design and requirements gathering, through to roles involving Strategic Planning and thought leadership.
Michael is a seasoned people manager who has built several of his teams from scratch.
No comments :
Post a Comment